Showing posts with label science fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science fiction. Show all posts
Friday, November 12, 2010

The Hill Valley Storm!


    55 years ago on November 12th 1955, a huge storm hit Hill Valley. Lightning struck the Clock Tower, trees fell and hallucinogenic pollen was in the air. At least that's the only way to explain rumours of flaming skid marks on Main Street or flying cars out near the tunnel.

    In honour of this remarkable event from the movie Back to the Future (which itself is 25 years old this year) today's From the Library selection brings you some of the great soundtracks from the big and small screens. Some extremely well known, others remarkably obscure.

    From the Library is produced by thap gump in conjunction with the Alexandrian Free Library Consortium of Second Life. You can listen to the programme now in-world at http://music.radioriel.org, or click one of the buttons below. Today's programme is presented by Edward Pearse.

    Tune in: Winampwindows Media PlayerReal           PlayerQuickTime

    For more information on the Alexandrian Free Library, current exhibits and the work of Consortium members in general, please visit the Alexandrian Free Library website, or one of their branches in-world
    Source URL: https://idontwanttobeanythingotherthanme.blogspot.com/search/label/science%20fiction
    Visit i dont want tobe anything other than me for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
Thursday, July 16, 2009

Proust on Suffering and Beauty

    16 July 2009

    While watching Episode 7 of Torchwood Season Two last night, Susan and I noted that Captain Jack Harkness attributed the following statement to Proust:

    "Only in suffering do we recognize beauty."

    I have so far been unable to verify this quotation. However, I do note that my web search has uncovered the following remarks by Proust, most of them along this general theme:

    "Those whose suffering is due to love are, as we say of certain invalids, their own physicians."

    "And this is the artist's source of suffering: to be powerless to turn the eyes of memory, the mind's eye, and reason toward Beauty, Being, or Love."

    "In reality, in love there is a permanent suffering which joy neutralizes, renders virtual, delays, but which can at any moment become what it would have become long earlier if one had not obtained what one wanted, atrocious."

    "Until I saw Chardin's painting, I never realized how much beauty lay around me in my parents' house, in the half-cleared table, in the corner of a tablecloth left awry, in the knife beside the empty oyster shell."

    "Let us leave pretty women to men without imagination."

    "The past not merely is not fugitive, it remains present."

    "We are healed of a suffering only by experiencing it to the full."

    "Everything great in the world comes from neurotics. They alone have founded our religions, and composed our masterpieces. Never will the world know all it owes to them, nor all they have suffered to enrich us."

    "The opinions which we hold of one another, our relations with friends and kinsfolk are in no sense permanent, save in appearance, but are as eternally fluid as the sea itself."

    “Happiness serves hardly any other purpose than to make unhappiness possible.”

    “Happiness is beneficial for the body, but it is grief that develops the powers of the mind.”

    "It has been said that beauty brings a promise of happiness, but it could be otherwise that the possibility of joy is the beginning of beauty."

    "We always end up doing the thing we are second best at."
    _Source URL: https://idontwanttobeanythingotherthanme.blogspot.com/search/label/science%20fiction
    Visit i dont want tobe anything other than me for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
Monday, June 16, 2008

Jian Ghomeshi: A Deep Breath of New LIfe for Canadian Culture

    15 June 2008, updated 16 June 2008, 20 September 2009 & 21 March 2011

    Jian Ghomeshi has been growing on me.

    Here's how far I've come.

    I have been a regular CBC Radio listener since moving to Canada in December 1971. I am (or have been) a devotee of Don Harron, Peter Gzowski, Barbara Frum, Alan Maitland, Lister Sinclair, Arthur Black, Michael Enright, Rex Murphy, Rick MacInnes-Rae, Holger Petersen, Eleanor Wachtel, Nora Young, Randy Bachman, Bob McDonald, Stuart McLean, Rick Phillips, James Keelaghan, Andrea Ratuski... and many more.

    I am also an opponent of the CBC cutbacks, which have been ongoing since I arrived in Canada.

    While I hold to post-liberal, quasi-libertarian views about the need for governments to do less with respect to economic management and business development, I am a huge advocate of high quality infrastructure - in my view, that is what governments do best. Top calibre infrastructure is critical to all aspects of quality of life in free societies.

    In my view, CBC Radio represents the cultural infrastructure of Canada. The CBC has always done its job right - exceedingly well, in fact.

    Because CBC Radio is important to me (I'm not a television watcher), I hold high expectations for this institution. I have often commented that giving up the CBC is the main thing that stops me from moving back to the United States (though I suppose the CBC is now available as a Sirius satellite radio channel or as a podcast - both forms of media which I am unlikely to use unless my life slows down quite a bit from its present pace).

    Therefore, when Jian Ghomeshi launched a new arts-culture-entertainment show aimed at Generation X-Y sensibilities, my immediate response was instinctively negative - and visceral. I felt sickened.

    (My longstanding deepest and darkest fear is of ending my days in an anonymous seniors' residence staffed by members of a younger generation who would play heavy metal, rap and hiphop music in the background 24 hours a day!)

    Ghomeshi's radio program Q (named, I believe, for the Studio from which it is broadcast) first aired on April 16, 2007. For the first several weeks, if not months, I couldn't stand the show. I used to shut Gomeshi off and listen to Segovia on my car's CD player.

    I can tell you exactly what I found annoying about Ghomeshi as well. To my ears (never having seen him) he had all the aggravating traits of a pierced and tattooed, trend-following, know-nothing 20 or 30-something. He was too self-conscious. He laughed at himself excessively.

    Ghomeshi was not targeting his show at my generational stratum, and he had some rough spots which seriously annoyed me.

    Fast forward to June 2008.

    I can now honestly state that my perception of Ghomeshi has evolved to the point that he has become perhaps my favourite current CBC Radio personality.

    I haven't enjoyed anyone this much at the CBC since the days of Peter Gzowski, whom I only once met in person (Mr. Gzowski was too preoccupied jonesing for a smoke at a Frontier College literacy fundraiser to be in a position to make casual conversation; Gzowski read several of my letters on air, in particular some thoughts I had about Louis Riel and the Red River Rebellion - and I'm quite satisfied with that).

    What triggered my turnaround on Ghomeshi?

    In brief, it was Ghomeshi's interviews. Not only did he have a knack for asking the right question and pressing the right point - which of course was always Gzowski's strength; he also had the ability to build upon the rapport he established with his guests to enable them to be direct and candid with us as radio listeners.

    I had taken an initial dislike to Ghomeshi's personality - but Ghomeshi's interviews weren't about him. In fact, he has proven to be strikingly unself-centred. Ghomeshi's interviews were thoroughly about his guests, and that was refreshing.

    Additionally, his guests are not all 20 and 30-somethings. I discovered - to my surprise - that he can keep pace with senior "heavyweight" interviewees as well.

    So how much time do I now waste listening to Ghomeshi interviews?

    Zero. The time is simply not wasted.

    This guy is asking the questions I would ask if I knew what questions to ask.

    And I confess - I don't know how to approach people in the way that Ghomeshi does. In fact, very, very few of us do. And this is why we need the Gzowskis - and the Ghomeshis - of the world.

    The unique but limited cadre of insightful interviewers - among whose numbers I count Ghomeshi as an elite member - demonstrate a deep love and respect for the human spirit, and they reveal it in their conversations, bringing us, their listeners, closer to that place of heightened awareness which they inhabit. It is a good place to be.

    Ghomeshi has defined arts, culture and entertainment broadly for his new radio program. Broadly enough that quite a few of his guests hold no intrinsic interest for me... until Ghomeshi talks to them, that is.

    Whether it is an aspiring hiphop artist (not a genre that interests me), Katee Sackhoff and Grace Park of Battlestar Galactica (I'm a science fiction fan, and this program - after I first learned about it on "Q." - turned out to be top notch science fiction), or Salman Rushdie, for goodness sake - this fellow brings his guests alive!

    While I don't remember much about the interview with the aspiring hiphop artist, I'll acknowledge that the Sackhoff-Park interview brought me around - despite the fact that both of these persons are 20 or 30-somethings. Though I am a science fiction afficianado, I had never thought twice about taking time to watch a remake of Battlestar Galactica. I am interested in what I call "authentic" or "classic" science fiction, the primary function of which is to explore the implications of ideas by constructing future scenarios which allow those ideas to play out in possibly complex and interesting ways.

    Recycled 1970s science fiction "cheese" didn't capture my imagination. That is, until I was surprised to hear Ghomeshi, Sackoff and Park discussing how such contemporary issues as suicide bombing, civilian versus military government, detention of unlawful combatants, and the capacity of the human heart for far-reaching and complex manifestations of evil and good, are treated in what I later discovered to be a highly relevant, brilliantly scripted and acted program (produced in large part in Canada), which is also cinematic in scope, despite its confinement to the (now-also-wide) television screen.

    Hats off to Ghomeshi for alerting me to this hidden artistic gem (and, over time, to many others).

    It was the Salman Rushdie interview which finally put me over the top, however. Entirely unself-consciously (and opposite to my original image of him), Ghomeshi drew out and nurtured Rushdie's self-exposition on every topic you can imagine - from being the target of a Fatwa, to playing the role of an "arts superstar," to moving beyond the novel to take on parts in movies, a la Gore Vidal (as Rushdie himself pointed out, I believe).

    As I have learned is typically the case during Ghomeshi's interviews, Rushdie came scintillatingly alive. I bristled with anticipation for the next turn of their conversation. This was something I wanted to be a part of. Ghomeshi and Rushdie were electric, and I was tuning in.

    So, who is Jian Ghomeshi?

    In short, he is a classic embodiment of the multiple paradoxes of Canada in his own background.

    To begin, Mr. Ghomeshi is actually 40-something. He was born on June 9,1967. He's been around a bit longer than I had initially suspected.

    This enlightened and literate pacifist is in fact an unassuming Iranian Muslim by origin. The Shah of Iran, deposed in 1979, was the ruler of the country at the time Ghomeshi came to Canada - meaning that the Iran he was raised in was very different than the Iran of today. I also note that the Indo-European Shi'a majority populace have always been more liberal than their rulers. And historically, Irananians have had a laudable record of tolerance of diversity, as is certainly exemplified in Mr. Ghomeshi's attitudes. He was raised for several years in Uxbridge, a suburb of London, England, and then moved with his family to Canada at age 8 to reside first in Don Mills, and then in Thornhill - where he was immersed in Canadian Jewish culture - of all things!

    As Ghomeshi understates the matter, "I'm just a typical Canadian."

    I was surprised to learn that Gomeshi was - from 1992-2000 - a member of Moxy Früvous, where he played drums, percussion (bongos) and tin whistle. Moxy Früvous were a "counter-cultural" musical group well-known to me through my friend Nichole Riese and through past attendance at the Winnipeg Folk Festival.

    I for one wasn't expecting the next Gzowski (himself a survivor of print journalism and former youngest-ever managing editor of Maclean's Magazine) to be coming from such an entirely different cultural space.

    But is this not the way that change almost always occurs - when and how we least expect it?

    By the way, Gzowski and Gomeshi have something else in common. Both are/were songwriters. Yes, you knew Gomeshi is a songwriter (presently with MapleMusic), but Gzowski wrote the landmark "One Single River" with Ian Tyson. This anthem to Canadian national unity was recorded both by Ian and Sylvia and by Bob Dylan and The Band.

    I could say more, but most of the rest has been said elsewhere. Listen to Jian Ghomeshi at CBC Radio Q - for arts, culture and entertainment in Canada.

    Try these links for more information about Jian Gomeshi:
    20 September 2009: Mr. Ghomeshi came to heightened prominence following his interview with a petulant Billy Bob Thornton, who had apparently woken up on the wrong side of the bed prior to his early-morning meeting with Jian. The Star story (above) makes brief note of the encounter, in which Mr. Thornton likens Canadians to "mashed potatoes." The encounter, managed in an exemplary manner by Mr. Ghomeshi, has been commented on widely and often across Canada. Click here for the QTV flash video of the encounter. Then, you can decide for yourself.

    My personal take? Mr. Thornton embarrassed his band-mates, sabotaging their work in order to give voice to his unwarranted narcissistic injury in a stand-off with a polite and capable host who at no point meant nor offered any offense to him. My previously high opinion of Mr. Thornton has been considerably diminished, primarily due to his disregard of the original purpose of the interview, which was to promote the work of a group of which he is (was?) only a single member. The interview ended up being about Billy Bob and his ill-informed views of Canadians, rather than about him and his band-mates.

    That was supremely self-centred, Billy Bob, as well as petty, mean and pointless!

    21 March 2011: As the years have passed, Ghomeshi links have proliferated. I can no longer comment on all of them, as I initially attempted in 2008.



    However, this one ("Jian Ghomeshi: Minding his Peace and Qs) is exemplary. Where Jian lives. It's personal and interesting. And yes, I want the guy's house!
    _Source URL: https://idontwanttobeanythingotherthanme.blogspot.com/search/label/science%20fiction
    Visit i dont want tobe anything other than me for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

Battlestar Q

    16 June 2008

    I have blogged recently about Jian Ghomeshi's broad-brush enthusiasm for Canadian arts, culture and entertainment. It was the very eclectic and literate Ghomeshi, host of the CBC Radio program Q, who opened my mind to the Battlestar Galactica television series, which has run from 2003 through its scheduled denouement in 2009.

    As I am not a television watcher, I have to derive my television-related news from other sources. In this case, Jian Ghomeshi's CBC Radio program worked for me.

    It was Ghomeshi's interview with Katee Sackhoff and Grace Park of Battlestar Galactica that brought this cutting edge program to my attention. I was already a science fiction fan, but I didn't know about this program - until I learned about it on "Q."

    Jian Ghomeshi's Sackhoff-Park interview brought me to the point of purchasing the DVD version of this program.

    I had never previously thought twice about taking time to watch a remake of the
    1978-1980 Battlestar Galactica series.

    I am interested in what I call "authentic" or "classic" science-based science fiction, the primary function of which is to explore the implications of ideas of scientific interest by constructing future scenarios which allow those ideas to play out in possibly complex and interesting ways, including development of the psychological, interpersonal and societal implications of such ideas.


    Recycled 1970s science fiction "cheese" didn't capture my imagination. That is, until I was surprised to hear Ghomeshi, Sackoff and Park discussing how such contemporary issues as suicide bombing, civilian versus military government, detention and treatment of unlawful combatants, and the capacity of the human heart for far-reaching and complex manifestations of evil and good, are treated in this program.

    Soon thereafter, I purchased my first Battlestar Galactica DVD set (season 2.5 happened to be on the shelves at the time). I discovered
    Battlestar Galactica to be a highly relevant, brilliantly scripted and subtly acted program. I already knew through the interview on Q that it is produced in both Canada and the US, with most of the filming taking place in Canada.

    Despite its confinement to the (now-also-wide) television screen, Battlestar Galactica is cinematic in scope. The parallels to Tolstoy's War and Peace have certainly crossed my mind a few times while watching the best-scripted episodes of the program....

    It turns out that Battlestar Galactica has two academy award winners on staff (Edward James Olmos and Mary McDonnell). There is plenty of depth of field in the cast to back them up, and the writers (spearheaded by writer/director/executive producer Ronald D. Moore) deserve credit for their ability to reframe the issues of our time in an alternative context which reilluminates some perhaps obvious points that are not always quite so clear while we are living them out today. (Ron Moore's blog here.)

    The program's creators have also rethought the original program's reliance upon male leads, by substituting many of the key original characters with females.

    In other words, this program does what science fiction is supposed to do, by examining timeless concepts and the range and limits of human capacities in a radically altered set of social, environmental and technological circumstances.

    Similarly to Firefly, the other recent high quality made-for-television science fiction program, Battlestar Galactica is in fact much more about psychological and social exploration than about scientific possibilities.

    The program in fact teaches very little about science per se - in contrast to the works of the classic science fiction writers, such as Heinlein, Asimov and Clarke - but the lack of depth in science fact is, for now at least, a forgivable omission... though I do fret about the scientific illiteracy of our North American youth in an increasingly science-driven world.

    Hats off to Jian Ghomeshi for alerting me to this hidden artistic gem.

    Battlestar Galactica - despite the distraction of its perhaps unfortunate title, is fundamentally a program about ideas. If you are interested in the implications of complex social, ethical and political questions, sign on to Battlestar Galactica for a mind-stretching ride!
    Source URL: https://idontwanttobeanythingotherthanme.blogspot.com/search/label/science%20fiction
    Visit i dont want tobe anything other than me for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
Thursday, April 10, 2008

Blog Topics I May Never Post

    10 April 2008

    Attributable perhaps to enjoying my present four weeks' vacation, my head has been swimming with topics I want to post on my blog.

    I may not get a chance to commit all of these subjects to electronic signals (virtual script, as it were).

    Therefore, just in case these ideas never see the digital light of day, here are some tentative headings....

    (1) "Lane Bike." A discussion of the favourable Southern California bicycling environment.

    (2) "Battlestar Galactica: An Analogical Essay on the Theme of Tolstoy's War and Peace." In my view, Edward James Olmos could be nominated either for the Emmy Award or the Nobel Peace Prize - or both simultaneously. And he enjoys a supporting cast worthy of Tolstoy's magnum opus. This is rare classic science fiction, explaining why yet another great program is unwinding this year.

    (3) "What Do You Love - Part 2." I've been planning to revisit this topic for months. The secret key is "stories."

    (4) "Inner Skills." Addressing our inner realities and promoting change by solving emotions rather than solving problems.

    (5) "Burnout, Exhaustion, Euphoria." A study of my particular style of vacationing. Not recommended for others, but it's what I do. A follow-up to an earlier post.

    (6) "The People Who Have Shaped My Life." A planned set of ongoing essays about some remarkable people and my good fortune in having had contact with them. Names include Ralph E. Hunt, my father; Genevieve Likins Hunt, my mother; Barbara Rosen, who has recently passed on; Jean Hilton, my "other mother": David Weiser, my childhood role model; Helen & Scott Nearing, role models at a distance; Jon Culbertson, biology teacher and gymnastics/fitness instructor and guide (photo below); and many, many more. This project is likely going to take some time.

    Bear with me. I'll write more when I have some time and my motivation is suitable.

    In the interim, peace be with you.

    Source URL: https://idontwanttobeanythingotherthanme.blogspot.com/search/label/science%20fiction
    Visit i dont want tobe anything other than me for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
Monday, October 1, 2007

Code 46 - Another Authentic Science Fiction Film

    2 October 2007

    I have had further success in finding an authentic science fiction film.


    Code 46, starring Tim Robbins and Samantha Morton, is another low-budget effort that for the most part could have been a stage play. The director is Michael Winterbottom.

    That’s right. This one is about the acting, and Robbins and Morton excel. But the premise is pure science fiction. What if biotechnology had become very advanced, and humans were widely reproduced through in vitro fertilization and cloning in order to regulate the emergence of troublesome genes?

    This particular effort is low budget enough that there was no attempt to construct futuristic settings. Shanghai seemed a sufficiently futuristic city, so the crew operated in that city for two weeks (due to limited funds) – and the interiors were shot largely in London. The buildings, household items, and vehicles are exactly those you would have seen in 2003 when the movie was filmed.

    Particularly during the scenes inside the vehicles, with evident contemporary Toyota logos, I was once again reminded of Godard’s use of “intergalactic space” in
    Alphaville.


    The film is set nominally in a future different than our own due primarily to the presence of advanced biotechnology (fingers can also be regrown), ozone-piercing ultraviolet radiation from the sun forcing a nocturnal lifestyle, further multi-ethnic blending in the world’s leading urban centres, and the rigid segregation of the genetically pure from the genetically tainted.

    However, given that there was so little effort dedicated to creating a futuristic set, my own preference would be to consider this an alternative reality film. What if
    Alejandro Zaffaroni had been born 50 years earlier and nothing had been done about chlorofluorocarbons? Let’s just think of this as a self-reproducing fractal universe parallel to our own, courtesy of superstring and inflation theory (now perhaps increasingly in question, due to oscillating universe theory, but that’s another matter).

    Now, let’s add a couple of additional elements. How about a virus that is neurologically active, enhancing empathy? Add to this a chance meeting with a woman who might be the clone of your mother – but she is young – near your age. Your genetic similarity is 50%, and perhaps you have never met your mother, due to being raised by host parents.

    How might you respond to this person with whom you are deeply biologically but not experientially linked? There is only enhanced empathy to guide you.


    How refreshing that this is not a film “about” technology. Nor is it a disguised thriller, action or horror movie.

    Code 46 is quite simply the story of how two human beings might respond to a new type of situation that could be made possible only through the implementation of technologies which are presently conceivable, but not yet in application.

    Robbins and Morton seem to understand this intuitively, and everything in the film is focused around their very human solution to this dilemma – a solution, of course, which the genetically regulated society cannot permit. I do not think this film could have been better acted. It is first rate.

    Watch and enjoy. It’s the real thing!
    Source URL: https://idontwanttobeanythingotherthanme.blogspot.com/search/label/science%20fiction
    Visit i dont want tobe anything other than me for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
Monday, August 27, 2007

Night of the Comet

    27 August 2007

    When I'm working hard, I can't watch a Bergman, Oliver Stone or Kurosawa movie. It takes too much effort, and it can be too much like work. I haven't been able to watch a Woody Allen movie in probably a decade. I don't do angst well when I'm overworked.



    By way of contrast, B movies are great when my brain is tired.

    Interestingly, a good B movie can be entertaining for its creativity, as well as for an assumed level of mindlessness.

    Night of the Comet, released in 1984, is a great example of that. The ability of the production team to create this classic “last people on earth” science fiction effort on a budget of $500,000-700,000 is in fact quite admirable.

    The premise of the film is highly tenuous, that a comet that last visited the earth at the time of the dinosaurs’ extinction 65 million years ago is now returning, and taking out life on the planet all over again. Of course, a tenuous premise is part of what makes a B movie interesting. Where can the director/writer go with this thin thread connecting the elements of the story?

    Fortunately, the film’s writer and director (
    Thom Eberhardt) pulls off this feat quite successfully.

    After the comet’s tail has basically turned almost all life on earth to calcium dust, Eberhardt captures the results in an imaginative low-budget fashion. Somewhat obviously, the highways of Los Angeles are deserted – in fact overly deserted, given that some people must have been driving the highway when the comet’s toxic tail swiped our planet. OK, we can suspend disbelief about that. (Mr. Eberhardt notoriously used his own Mercedes as one of the abandoned vehicles in the film.)

    Then we witness a series of electronic timers setting off various bits of machinery that will operate for no one. And the sidewalks of the city are littered with piles of human clothing and reddish calcium dust. An inexpensive but potent way to portray the comet’s destructive impact.

    As we would expect in a B-movie, there is no effort to explain why electrical power is flowing seamlessly, gasoline is available to operate vehicles driven by southern California's few survivors, houses are not burning due to stovetops being left on, natural gas leaks are not causing explosions, nuclear power plants are not melting down, etc. The planet, complex technological infrastructure and all, is eerily quiet, and strangely intact.

    Let us disregard all of this, and maintain our brains in a state of deeply relaxed and narrowly focused alertness.

    Eberhardt later acknowledged that he had no idea, as a young director, how many basic rules of movie-making he was breaking. He mixed the genres of science fiction, horror and comedy as with a blender. Like Joss Whedon, Eberhardt was interested in strong female characters, and he headed up the movie with two female leads and no primary male characters.

    The leading characters, Regina (
    Catherine Mary Stewart, originally of Edmonton, Alberta) and Samantha (Kelli Maroney, originally of Minneapolis, Minnesota) are airy California valley girls who are surprisingly resourceful (it just so happens, for example, that their mostly absent Green Beret father took them to target practice, instructing them in the use of automatic weapons).

    Primarily interested in video games and cheerleading practice at the outset, the two girls turn out to have more than what it takes to confront evil, save the imperilled (including each other as needed), and basically preserve life (and orderliness) on earth.

    Siskel and Ebert loved the film, and this was a significant boon in the early days of its release. Night of the Comet double-billed with Schwarzenegger’s unexpected early blockbuster, The Terminator, at drive-ins that year, garnering the better reviews of the two films. However, the hoped-for blockbuster, 1984, had to be released before the year was out, and this caused Night of the Comet to get bumped early at many theatres, despite its grossing many multiples of its modest production cost.

    Other reviewers have noted that the film captures a unique era in West Coast culture (big hair and shoulder pads), but Eberhardt was in fact capturing some very capable and imaginative acting on-screen as well. This is particularly commendable, given that the film was so low budget that essentially every foot of film that was shot ended up in the final release of the movie.

    I note that the film is often grouped with “Zombie” films, but I think this is a serious error in categorization. In this film, the “zombies” are people with apparent partial exposure to the comet who are just desiccating more slowly than the majority, who were killed instantly. The zombies don't keep coming back, in fact, they are expiring rapidly with no intervention required by our heroes.


    Most importantly, the film is not really about combat with the zombies at all. Nor is it about special effects. It is primarily a dialogue-based composition, and some of the dialogue is surprisingly intelligent, heartfelt, and/or clever.

    Therefore, in my view, this is a classic low budget science fiction “what if” type of movie. In this case, a familiar theme, “last people on earth,” is played out with verve, irony and imagination.

    As an interesting side note, the female co-lead,
    Kelli Maroney, has remained interested in and committed to the concept of doing further work based on the film. Trained originally at the esteemed Guthrie Theatre in Minneapolis, and then schooled in Shakespeare in New York City, Ms. Maroney’s film career took her unexpectedly in this direction – primarily through her roles in the present film, and earlier, in the classic “Fast Times at Ridgemont High.”

    Ms. Maroney originally sought to produce a sequel to Night of the Comet, but discovered that MGM were, at least at the time, uninterested in surrendering their franchise for the movie. Perhaps fortuitously, MGM finally got around to releasing the film in stripped-down DVD version only in the spring of this year, but fairly shortly after refusing Ms. Maroney’s request to option the rights to the original film.

    Ms. Maroney has spoken openly about her love for this film, conducting
    interviews on many occasions over the intervening two decades, and often appearing at conventions for film buffs. Ms. Maroney acknowledges that she still keeps one of the two original cheerleading outfits in her closet, and announces proudly that it still fits her fine.


    I honestly have no idea what could be done with a sequel to Night of the Comet, but it is a fun idea to play with. Hopefully, someday, somewhere, a fitting sequel might be produced. If so, let's be sure to keep the budget (and special effects) low, and the production and acting standards high, in which case, a sequel would be a nice fit with the very imaginative and entertaining original!

    P.S. I must acknowledge that I have actually been minimizing how much I like this movie because of its (quite self-aware) B-movie categorization.

    On reflection, a number of my lifetime favourite movies have been low-budget projects, and this perhaps because low budget movies make demands upon the imagination, rather than upon the sensory systems.

    Among my all-time favourites are such works as "Happy Birthday Wanda June" (so low budget it is almost impossible to find), Alphaville (a classic Godard take on the low budget science fiction idea, much of it shot in "inter-galactic space" - in this case referring to the Ford Galaxy driven by the lead characters), Cherry 2000 (a movie about what kind of relationship you can and can't have with a robot) and Forbidden Planet (previously discussed on this site). I have also discussed "The Searchers" recently - profoundly politically incorrect by modern sensibilities, but again, more of a treat for the imagination than for the senses. So, what is wrong with the formula - low budget, big imagination?

    In fact, the story-line of Night of the Comet is a highly imaginative twist on a classic science fiction theme. The dialogue is fresh. The minimal use of props and special effects maximizes the power of the imaginative dimension of the story (in such a way as a stage production might do). The heroines are blunt, lively, appealing and ultimately admirable. And, perhaps most importantly, the acting by virtually all of the characters is entirely creditable, with just the right dose of understatement or overstatement as required by each situation.

    Granted, there is a liberal dose of improbability, silliness and occasional dramatic excess, but these condiments are offered unself-consciously. I don't think I'd be over-stating it to suggest that Night of the Comet is probably as good as any low budget movie can get. And that statement is made in recognition that low budget productions not uncommonly excel the quality of those made at many multiples of the cost of the shoestring effort.

    There is something about the constraints of having next to no money that creates a "right attitude" in the production crew and cast of certain low budget films, and Night of the Comet has that (right) attitude in spades!
    Source URL: https://idontwanttobeanythingotherthanme.blogspot.com/search/label/science%20fiction
    Visit i dont want tobe anything other than me for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
Sunday, August 12, 2007

RUMOURS OF SERENTIY II

    12 August 2007

    Joss Whedon, producer of the acclaimed science fiction television series "Firefly," and of the related theatrical release "Serenity,"
    commented on August 3, 2007 that strong sales for the soon-to-be-released Serenity Collector's Edition DVD could possibly spark a sequel to a very well-received movie.


    The new edition is scheduled for release on August 21, 2007. This recent remark is a new tack for Mr. Whedon, who has discouraged previous talk of a Serenity sequel, though he has long acknowledged that Firefly/Serentiy is his favourite project.

    Mr. Whedon does not indicate any communication on the matter with Universal Studios, but he argues that the original project is now in the black, and that a successful Collector's Edition launch would cement Serentiy the movie as a successful commercial venture. Under these conditions, Mr. Whedon felt that the studio could possibly rethink a sequel.

    He also indicated that the Collector's Edition DVD includes truly new special features, including an all-new commentary, as well as an expanded "making of" featurette and the well-received River Tam sessions, produced for the internet in advance of the movie.

    I will add that a sequel to the movie is more hopeful than a sequel to the television series, given Mr. Whedon's positive relationship with Universal Studios, versus his more difficult relationship with Fox Network, the producers of Firefly.
    Source URL: https://idontwanttobeanythingotherthanme.blogspot.com/search/label/science%20fiction
    Visit i dont want tobe anything other than me for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
Tuesday, August 7, 2007

A B Movie 2 C

    7 August 07

    Here is an entirely different type of post for my blog.

    Were it not for
    Nathan Fillion of the Firefly/Serenity series, Susan and I would never have watched Slither last week. (Fillion can currently be seen in "Waitress.")


    Abashedly, I'll admit I'm glad we did.

    Fillion did not disappoint, though I doubt that he made a bundle of money for his starring role in this B-movie. We’d gladly have him back on Serenity for years more of Firefly episodes.

    The budget was so slim that the monster effects had to be scaled down to what the production crew could afford. Thus, the nasty little slithery monsters had to attack the victim/survivor of the cover of the DVD on the balcony outside the house, because there were not sufficient funds to pay for the little critters to swarm through her home.

    So, what was good about this B-movie? Well, director
    James Gunn has a sense of humour, and is utterly reverent for some of the masters of this genre, particularly Canadian David Cronenberg.

    Allusions to other films are interspersed throughout, including one that we caught – Fillion refuses the hand grenade to a deputized posse member, as he did with Jayne in Firefly (Susan noticed this, I hope I've got it right). Also, the lead character in Cronenberg's The Fly is referenced in a brand name at the supermarket, so the trivia buffs will be delighted.

    Gunn prefers the “creepy” to the scary, and he has a fairly deft sense of where to draw the line between these two distinctly different genres. While the aliens take out most community members in the (I presume mythical) town of Wheelsy, it is not through the type of gruesome and mounting body count that typifies slasher movies (which hold no appeal at all for me personally).

    Further, the monsters and their attack strategy to conquer planet earth are fairly imaginative, to say the least, and the actors have taken the script and run with it, including some younger children (who did very well at playing “zombies”) as well as several established actors, who are clearly quite skilful at their craft. The aliens never advance beyond Wheelsy, because the tiny band of local survivors are ultimately so capable of fending them off.

    I would say that I laughed at the various permutations and mating strategies of the lead monster more than at anything else. You have to see his dangling (slithering?) arm and the queen of the colony to understand what I am talking about on this point. May I tell you that the alien beast inhabits the body of a principal character, and that the merged personatily's obsessive fixation with the previously unresponsive wife of this key character is a source of much of the film’s irony. Unfortunately for our alien-inhabited antagonist, I believe that Fillion will get the girl, though the film does not pursue this thread of the story.

    Not much more to say about a B-movie of this type. If you're looking for
    Kurosawa, Antonioni or Bergman – this is not it.

    But if you'd like to be provoked to laugh at something that is ultimately light and imaginative, well, it might be worth two hours if you really have nothing at all else to do!
    Source URL: https://idontwanttobeanythingotherthanme.blogspot.com/search/label/science%20fiction
    Visit i dont want tobe anything other than me for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection
Sunday, July 8, 2007

Interesting Firefly Events Ending 2007

    8 July 2007

    For the Browncoats among us - who of course are known to be a secretive group - there are some interesting events scheduled for later 2007.


    Serenity LA is operated by a British-based convention company featuring several cast members over a 3-day period on November 2-4, 2007 at the prestigious Element Nightclub in Hollywood. This will provide an opportunity to meet Shepherd Book, Inara, Jayne and Kaylee, among others.



    Shepherd Book and the consumately evil Adelai Niska will also be available for a Browncoat Cruise on the Carnival Elation from San Diego to Cabo San Lucas on December 1-6, 2007.


    Click on the links (above) for more information.Source URL: https://idontwanttobeanythingotherthanme.blogspot.com/search/label/science%20fiction
    Visit i dont want tobe anything other than me for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

Blog Archive